A 1969 issue of Jaguar magazine, from the Internet Archive.
There seems to be some discussion about whether the interviewer from Jaguar magazine, mentioned in yesterday's post, is really Robert Anton Wilson, so let's stay on that topic a moment.
Michael Johnson writes (comment at yesterday's blog post): "IIRC, Mike Gathers and I parsed very closely the interviewer for Jaguar (1966...so RAW either had just started working at Playboy or was shortly to begin his 5 year stint there), trying to figure out of it was RAW or not. We both thought it probably was him, based on the nature of the Qs and the style. The "right where you are sitting now" was persuasive."
I was struck by the "right where you are sitting now" quote I highlighted yesterday, too, of course, and note that RAW's book
Right Where You Are Sitting Now is dedicated to Burroughs and Philip K. Dick.
Jesse Walker writes, "1. The
*Jaguar* interview includes this exchange:
<
for 15 years, and have been off them
for 7 years now. Would you explain
how you got addicted?
BUR: Addiction is a disease of exposure.
By and large people become
addicts who are exposed to it. Doctors
and nurses, for instance, have a high
addiction rate. People who I knew at
the time were taking it. I took a shot
of morphine, liked it, and eventually
became addicted.>>
2. The *Fact* profile of Burroughs includes this exchange:
<addicted. “Addiction is a disease of exposure,” he replied. “By and
large people become addicts who are exposed to it—doctors and nurses,
for instance. People I knew at the time were using it. I took a shot,
liked it, and eventually became an addict.”>>
Clearly the same conversation, even if it's transcribed a little
differently.
3. The *Fact* profile is attributed to "Ronald Weston." We know that
Wilson used this pseudonym. He told me this directly.
4. We know that RAW wrote for both *Fact* and *Jaguar*."
Me again: Jaguar was a "men's magazine" for the time. I don't have a cover image for the January 1966 issue the Burroughs article appeared in, so I've illustrated this with a cover of a 1969 issue. Probably not a magazine you'd leave laying on your coffee table to impress friends or family members, but did the editors of such magazines get to run articles on esoteric topics that interested them, because the articles were largely beside the point in selling the magazine?
