Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea. Blog, Internet resources, online reading groups, articles and interviews, Illuminatus! info.

Showing posts with label Brian Doherty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brian Doherty. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

An 'Illuminatus!' reference in the New York Times


Brian Doherty (Cato Institute  photo)

To my pleasant surprise, the New York Times  runs a long obituary for Brian Doherty, libertarian chroniclers and RAW expert. And it mentions Illuminatus!

A couple of sentences from Trip Gabriel's piece:

"Mr. Doherty became a libertarian at the University of Florida in the late 1980s, from which he received a bachelor’s degree in journalism. But he traced his political tendencies even earlier, to his reading, as a 12-year-old, of a science fiction trilogy, Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson’s Illuminatus!

“ 'One of the specific purposes of that work, according to Wilson,' Mr. Doherty later wrote, 'was to do to the state what Voltaire did to the church — that is, reduce it to an object of contempt for all thoughtful people'.”

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Followups!

Brian Doherty. (Facebook photo. Source)

1. Two interesting new pieces have been posted about Brian Doherty since I ran the obituary Sunday. Nick Gillespie has written a remembrance: "On the way out of the talk, as valets pulled up our old, beat-up cars (mine a Toyota Tercel with 200,000 miles on it and a padlock on the trunk, his a decrepit Ford LTD station wagon he'd bought from Jacob Sullum), Brian mentioned to me that what he really liked about capitalism wasn't the way it punished anyone but just how many free riders it enabled."

Also, a new piece by Bryan Caplan, longer and better than what I linked to Sunday.

2. I got a comment some days ago that the links to Robert Anton Wilson's "Serpent Power" piece on this site were all dead links. I think I've fixed it and the link  under "Feature Articles and Interviews" on the right side of this page now works.

3. I also recently blogged about RAW meeting Ted Sturgeon, the famous science fiction writer. Sturgeon's More Than Human currently is a $2 Kindle ebook. Still $9 as a Nook ebook at Barnes and Nobel, unfortunately.

4. When Dan Simmons died, I ran a notice and complained that the New York Times did not run an obit.  An obituary has now in fact finally run.  I still think the paper should have run one for Greg Bear. 

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Brian Doherty has died


Brian Doherty. Facebook photo posted by Sherry Wong). 

Brian Doherty, 57, has died. He was the top modern historian of libertarianism, but also a genuine expert on Robert Anton Wilson, as I will remind everyone shortly.

Here is the obituary at Reason magazine, where he was a senior editor, working with other libertarian RAW fans such as Jesse Walker. The review gives full credit to his scholarship --- he wrote a long book called Radicals for Capitalism that is the definitive history of modern capitalism and also has material putting Robert Anton Wilson's politics in context with the libertarian movement -- but check out how he got interested in libertarianism: "Born in Brooklyn and raised mostly in Florida, Doherty first caught the libertarian bug at age 12 by gobbling up the Illuminatus! trilogy by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson." 

The Reason obituary by Matt Welch delves into Doherty's libertarian scholarship and journalism but also has lots of details about how Doherty founded a record label and played in various rock bands, and his interest in avant-garde art happenings, Burning Man,  underground comix and other pursuits. 

It's perhaps not the most important thing about him, but Doherty wrote one of the best guest posts ever published on this blog. "Robert Anton Wilson: A Conspiracy of Silence?" is a piece which Doherty originally hoped to publish in the New York Times Book Review. He gave me permission for me to run it in July 2015.  It's very good, please take a look. 

See also that when Hilaritas Press published A Non-Euclidian Perspective, a new collection of RAW's political writings, Jesse Walker assigned Doherty to review the book. 

I hope some of you will go ahead and read Doherty's RAW piece published on this blog. I could not remember how I got my hands on it, so I checked my email. 

One of my best blog posts here is my "Illuminatus! vs. Cryptonomicon" post, listing various parallels between the two works. I got a few nice comments, but in general I was a little disappointed it did not make more of a splash.

But I did get a nice email from Mr. Doherty, who wrote, "Very smart and thorough comparison of the two; I noted a much more casual resemblance between the two when desperately, and in the end fruitlessly, trying to convince an imagined NY TIMES BOOK REVIEW audience that they should give RAW a second thought.

"On his death I queried NYTBR about writing an appreciation essay on RAW; they said yes to the idea but rejected the actual essay, which was written in a rush and without much time to re-read RAW, and I think I was too scrupulously trying to connect him to "important" lit stuff. Or I just did a shitty job. At any rate, I append the still unpublished essay in case you are interested. (Nothing for a serious fan or scholar to learn from it, of course.)"

Of course I was pleased to get his feedback, but I also liked the attachment. Naturally, I immediately asked if I could run it, noting that he might still be trying to sell it and might have a better place for it, and he replied, "Oh, that piece is completely dead as anything sellable; if you think it has anything to offer the specialist audience at your site, please run it, I'd be delighted."

So I ran it. Mr. Doherty asked only, "If you choose to run it, do note the purpose for which it was written: to explain RAW to the generalist audience at NYTBR on the occasion of his death."

Here is a post on Facebook by Sherry Wong.  Bryan Caplan has posted an appreciation of Doherty's magnum opus.  I learned about the bad news when I saw Jesse Walker's posting on Facebook.  There's also an appreciation by Nick Gillespie,  and one from Sheldon Richman. 




Saturday, January 3, 2026

'Non-Euclidean' in 'Reason' magazine

 


Reason magazine, in the March issue, publishes a review of A Non-Euclidean Perspective: Robert Anton Wilson’s Political Commentaries 1960-2005.

The short piece by Brian Doherty, a noted historian of libertarianism, begins, "The works of Robert Anton Wilson, especially the Illuminatus! trilogy, were an alternative path to libertarianism, in the late 20th century. His influence has been less appreciated than that of his fellow novelist Ayn Rand, whose apodictic certainty based in ancient Greek philosophy he hilariously lampooned via the made-up novel discussed within Illuminatus!, Telemachus Sneezed."

There isn't a posting yet at the Reason website I can link to, but Rasa has posted it on Facebook. 


Sunday, November 20, 2022

Brian Doherty on RAW

 


As we are about to begin (on Nov. 28) a book group on the Hilaritas Press book Natural Law Or Don’t Put A Rubber On Your Willy And Other Writings From A Natural Outlaw, written by Robert Anton Wilson and edited by Chad Nelson, I thought a bit of background on RAW's relationship with libertarianism might be useful. While I maintain that Natural Law is not really a "libertarian book," in the title essay RAW squares off against other prominent libertarians in an essay originally published in a libertarian journal.

Radicals for Capitalism by Brian Doherty, published in 2007, is a history of the libertarian movement, more than 700 pages long, and it includes about four pages of discussion about Robert Anton Wilson.

Doherty says that RAW is "one of the last of the pure Benjamin Tuckerites" and explains that Wilson "love liberty but held fast to Tuckerite ideas that modern corporate capitalism and banking just weren't any kind of liberty he valued." 

Illuminatus! is described as "the most powerful and widely read libertarian artistic statement of the past thirty years," while also noting that "Wilson's work appeals on so many levels that one can become a Wilson Head without reaching his libertarianism. Through Wilson's influence one might become an Aleister Crowleyan, a Wilhelm Reichian, an old-fashioned Tuckerite, a techno-future-optimist in the manner of Buckminster Fuller or Timothy Leary."

Doherty's book also has a brief discussion of Discordianism and Kerry Thornley. Although it is obviously a bit out of date at this point, it is an interesting discussion of the history of libertarianism for those who might be interested. Doherty covers more recent developments in the movement for Reason magazine. 


Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Brian Doherty on Illuminatus! and RAW


Brian M. Doherty

[Brian M. Doherty is the author of four books: This Is Burning Man: The Rise of a New American Underground, Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement (which includes quite a bit of information about the development of Robert Anton Wilson's political ideas), Gun Control on Trial: Inside the Supreme Court Battle Over the Second Amendment  and Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired. I can personally recommend Radicals for Capitalism, which is lively and interesting and must have required an enormous amount of research. In his youth, Doherty founded Cherry Smash Records and played bass for punk rock bands, including The Jeffersons and Turbo Satan. He is a senior editor at Reason magazine.

Like his Reason colleague, Jesse Walker, Doherty, 47, has read a lot of Robert Anton Wilson in his time. When Wilson died in January 2007, Doherty pitched an appreciation piece on RAW to the New York Times Book Review, attempting to explain Wilson to a general audience. For whatever reason, the piece did not make it into print, and Doherty has now given me permission to share his never-published piece with you. --The Management].

Robert Anton Wilson: A Conspiracy of Silence? 

By Brian Doherty

Novelist Robert Anton Wilson died on January 11. Death’s bite was particularly bitter for his admirers. He intended to live forever — not as a literary memory, but as a live human. Wilson, author most famously of Illuminatus! (written with Robert Shea) insisted we were on the cusp of unprecedented leaps in control of the mechanics of life and intelligence, and an escape to a physically limitless future via space travel. His dedication to optimistic futurism was strong; when his young daughter was murdered in the 1970s, he had her brain frozen.

That act is a synecdoche for Wilson’s literary career—audacious, madly eccentric, curious and hopeful that the future will be better in unexpected ways, and cheerfully refusing to comport to “consensus reality.”

Illuminatus! was recognizably the work of a writer who adored James Joyce, Raymond Chandler, and Orson Welles. It’s replete with multiple viewpoints, narrative trickery both obvious and subtle for effects both playful and profound, avant-garde techniques used in a vulgarly pop context with an adventure plot, starring knight-like heroes seeking honor and truth in a complicated world where little was what it seemed — with lots of raunchy sex and long dialogues and lectures on political philosophy and epistemology held on an anarchist submarine exploring ancient Atlantis.

It took the paranoid panic of the multitude of conspiracy theories that he and Shea learned of via eccentric letters from Playboy readers during his late 1960s stint as an editor there and, imagining them all as simultaneously true, crafted from it absurdist pop opera in which outré facts and analysis forged the strange melody.

Illuminatus!, still in print from Dell 32 years after first publication, has sold over a quarter million copies. But Wilson’s career amounted to neither household name nor lasting respect. He is known, where he’s known at all, as a cult author—perhaps with a colorful virtue or two, trailing a coterie of (somewhat overenthusiastic) devotees, but not of serious literary worth. Wilson would note, with wounded pride, that “I have never had the fashionable pessimism and…despair necessary to get myself included among Serious Novelists in the judgment of New York critics.”

Well, other factors were at play; and critics notwithstanding, Wilson’s ideological and thematic fingerprints, his baroque world of conspiracies from ancient history clouding the present, of imaginative comic-book action marshaled for complicated scientific and philosophical exploration, have left their mark, whether acknowledged or merely obvious to his devotees, in everything from TV’s X-Files to Lost, from Umberto Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum to John Crowley’s Aegypt novel sequence.

The mighty presence who Wilson’s fictions most closely resemble is Thomas Pynchon, whose Gravity’s Rainbow came out after Illuminatus! was written, but before it was published. Their works have similarly sprawling, comic-bizarre takes on Big Crazy Ideas and the technological and bureaucratic forces that forged modernity and postmodernity. Wilson — the worse for his reputation — deals with it all more lightly, more humanely, in a prose style breezier and easier to take, clear and functional, with whimsies that serve his plot and theme more directly than Pynchon’s sometimes rambling fantasias.

Longtime Wilson followers also know that The Da Vinci Code was not the first novel to incorporate the Holy Blood, Holy Grail thesis about Jesus’s offspring and the Priory of Sion. It was central to Wilson’s three-volume “Historical Illuminatus” series (published from 1982-91). These were dramatizations of the major changes that European culture underwent in the late 18th century, covering politics, religion, music, and science, starring the ancestors of the characters in Illuminatus!.

That’s also a description of Neal Stephenson’s bestselling Baroque Cycle in relation to his Cryptonomicon. Stephenson, in an interview in Salon, hit at one of Wilson’s reputational problems when he complained that “In arty lit, it's become uncool to try to come to grips with ideas per se.”

For a quick perspective shift on the same phenomenon (which is the heart of Wilson’s writings): critic James Wood has said, of the modern lit-fiction whose work Wilson’s most closely resembles, that it is too obsessed with ideas and not enough with human beings, manically showing the writers “know a thousand different things.” Wood calls it “hysterical realism” and Wilson is a pioneer of it.

But Wilson is a master of a particular human drama: The drama of ideas in the human mind, which ought not be exiled from fiction’s kingdom. How new ideas shape and change human character is something Wilson not only showed, but caused.

In reading Wilson, the receptive reader can live though what the character is often living through—having one’s vision of politics, science, history, the very “meaning of life” evolve radically. Doing this clumsily can make you Richard Bach or a similarly thin didact. And the more Wilson you read, the more you hear the author telling you what’s what in his characters’ voices.

An authoritative answer as to his literary greatness—as the sometimes annoyingly scientific-agnostic Wilson would say, we lack an unfailingly accurate “greatnessometer”—is impossible. But in observable existential spacetime, as he’d describe it, we find over 1,000 comments on the personal blog post announcing his death, almost all noting he was an irreplaceable inspiration and guide in intellectual evolution.

This is not generally considered a respectable function for the novelist. Wilson’s work was not only an aesthetic experience, but a guide to new information, new models for interpreting the world. Among the thinkers and ideas for whom Wilson was a frequent first guide were Korzybski’s general semantics; Claude Shannon’s theories of information; Wilhelm Reich and his orgone; Timothy Leary’s models and theories of drugs as potentially profound tools of brain change; and the epistemological and ontological implications of quantum physics (which he built an entire trilogy around, Schrödinger’s Cat).

Wilson was an avatar for ideas that he saw as fecund ways to reimagine human existence, and that most literary intellectuals see as outmoded hippie-dippie nonsense. The newer generation of successful literary fiction writers would not, one expects, disagree with each other in important ways on politics and social attitudes or seek to remake anyone’s “reality tunnel” with drugs or weird science — good modern liberals for the most part, ready to vote Democratic. Wilson says that one of his goals with Illuminatus! was “to do to the State what Voltaire did to the Church — to reduce it to an object of contempt among all educated people.”

His limited literary respect is, then, ultimately no mystery. But his enduring value is in how he exemplified the thematic richness and sheer entertainment value of a literature of ideas not dismissive of, but not tied down to, character, plot, or Henry James’s “present palpable intimate.”

Wilson frequently defined information, after Shannon, as “surprise.” That’s what his work did for his readers: informed and surprised them. He showed the human mind can dial in more option-filled realities than everyday socio-political life and commonplace ideas knew of.

Those who loved him, loved him because his fiction enlarged their mental world, made it more entertaining and hopeful. In the Internet age, with an entire generation not necessarily reading standard literary fiction but dialing in their own realities — across a cyberspace more varied and ridiculous, as well as more tedious and banal, than its science fiction inventors imagined —Wilson’s importance can only grow.

Friday, July 20, 2012

No more acceleration of knowledge?

At Reason magazine's "Hit and Run" blog, Brian Doherty writes about Peter Thiel's recent public debate with Google's Eric Schmidt, and about how Thiel repeated his thesis that there has been a slowdown of development of new ideas in many areas of the economy. (This is also the thesis of Tyler Cowen's book, The Great Stagnation.) Writes Doherty, "Especially grim for those of who read too much Robert Anton Wilson in the early 1980s and began beliving in a "jumping Jesus" phenomenon in which our knowledge and mastery of the world would begin doubling in quicker and shorter increments, and whose retirement plans thus depended on the allegedly around-the-corner world of endless techno-wizardry that make energy production and matter manipulation as cheap as a value meal."

Obviously, some of RAW's short term technological prophecies have not panned out; we aren't migrating to space yet, or on the threshold for physical immortality. Perhaps RAW's thesis needs to be amended to note that the acceleration of knowledge doesn't apply to all fields of endeavor. (Cowen argues that the undoubted rapid development of computer technology and the Internet masks a slowdown of innovation in other areas, such as transportation.) Science fiction writer Neal Stephenson (another favorite of mine) has argued that we've failed to "think big" in recent decades; we could go into space now and do wonderful things, but we've become too risk averse.

Then again, perhaps RAW's point remains valid, even if the timetable should not be taken too literally; I  would think that advances in private space exploration such as the SpaceX company, continued developments in the Internet, biotechnology, green energy research, nanotechnology and other fields should be produce something interesting in the next decade or two. Could Thiel, Cowen, et al. be exaggerating the problem because policies that promote innovation are the most promising way to aid the economy?

Last year, I wrote a post noting that Thiel and RAW appear to have many similar interests.

Also at Hit and Run, Jesse Walker writes about the history of anti-Mormon paranoia,  noting that it has largely receded.