Scene from Intolerance. Did Babylon really have huge statues of elephants? It sure looks impressive.
It's a really long movie, so I was relieved it turned out to be excellent. The
Wikipedia article about the movie lists four different major versions of the public domain film. I watched the Kino version, 197 minutes long, which has a soundtrack. I checked it out from Hoopla. Finding a free version to watch online is not difficult,
there's one at the Internet Archive.
The influence on
Illuminatus! apparently consists in the way it uses separate plotlines and switches abruptly from one to the other. There's a modern plot about poor people being abused by the rich and by the system. Another plot depicts the life of Jesus, another shows Belshazzar's Babylon under attack from the Persians, and another shows the
St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre in France in 1572. The common theme is intolerance, not just religious intolerance, but the kind of intolerance that results in Prohibition and various moral crusades and moral panics.
I wasn't particularly looking forward to the life of Jesus stuff, and the actor playing The Nazarene, Howard Gaye, is kind of stiff, as if he's affected by the pressure of playing the Son of God. But the scenes from the New Testament are some of the best bits! The
wedding at Cana is depicted, with the first miracle of Jesus being an intervention to make sure there's plenty of good wine for the wedding celebration. There's also a great depiction of the incident in which Jesus
saves a woman from being stoned to death for adultery.
Although it dates back to 1916, in some ways Intolerance is more modern than I expected. A long movie with big crowd scenes anticipates many epics that came after. The plot about the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre depicting one religious faction killing people in another faction is unfortunately currently relevant. (While the plot depicts Catholics killing Protestants, Griffith shows that previously Protestants had carried out an attack on Catholics, and shows how one massacre becomes an excuse for another.) The jumps from one plotline to another are reminiscent of a recent film, Everything Everywhere All at Once, which to tell you the truth I didn't like all that much.
And there were other surprises. I did not expect the intensity of the violence. Some of the depictions of women in Babylon were sexier than I expected. I was also surprised by some of the crowd scenes. The huge sets in the Babylon scenes are really impressive. I did not expect such as "wow" factor from such an old movie.
Lots of critics of course have written about the movie. I couldn't find what Jesse Walker thought of it at his
movie review site. The Wikipedia article says Pauline Kael considered it the greatest movie ever made.
Here is the entire
review from Scott Sumner, one of my favorite bloggers: "Intolerance (US, 1916) 3.5 This rating doesn’t mean much as it’s both a great film and a deeply flawed film. Today, 1916 seems like ancient history, and thus this historical epic has an additional layer of meaning for 2019 viewers, as compared to what people saw in 1916. On the other hand, the images are less astonishing than they would have appeared to 1916 audiences. That trade-off is sort of a microcosm of life. Has any other major director ever produced a very liberal film immediately after producing a very conservative film?"
Some of Robert Anton Wilson's themes come up in the movie. It shows why Prohibition is wrong and doesn't work, and it depicts how the system is cruel to the poor.
In June, I'll pick another movie from RAW's
top one hundred and watch it and blog about it. As with
Intolerance, I'll announce my choice for anyone else who wants to take the opportunity to watch it, too.